Legal Opinion

Looker v. Hennessy

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Farnham, J.

Plaintiff, an infant now 12 years of age, moves pursuant to CPLR 3101 et seq. for an order directing the examination of defendant Crowell at a time to be fixed by the court relative to material facts in the case as presented by the pleadings. The motion is based on the pleadings and the affidavit of plaintiff’s counsel setting forth the necessity for the relief sought.

Defendant Crowell did not submit any answering affidavits or any memorandum of law on this motion.

In resolving this motion, the court is well aware of the Special Rule Respecting Calendar Practice as adopted by the Fourth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finn v. McLarenNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hoover v. RuthNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Walzer v. RettnerNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API