Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Ruth

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylor, J.

The plaintiffs move to vacate the notice of defendants Micel to examine them before trial pursuant to article 29 of the Civil Practice Act on several grounds. Only that of untimeliness merits consideration. The note of issue which they filed and served contained a statement pursuant to the special rule of the Appellate Division of this department respecting calendar practice to the effect that there had been a reasonable opportunity to complete the allowable preliminary proceedings, that the parties did not intend to conduct such and that the case was ready for trial. The defendants failed to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cerrone v. S'DoiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Finn v. McLarenNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Davis v. DavisNew York County Court, Ulster County · 1962
  4. Gramatan National Bank & Trust Co. v. FredetteNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Liberty Dressing Co. v. L. W. Foster Sportswear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API