Legal Opinion

De La Forest v. Yandle

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1959No. Civ. 9449PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondents following an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Accepting the allegations of the complaint as true, the facts may be stated as follows:

Plaintiff-appellant De La Forest was the operator of a truck repair shop. Plaintiff-appellant Mast Lumber Company owned and operated a truck and trailer. The middle axle of the trailer had become so worn as to require repair. Mast employed De La Forest to repair the axle and he sublet the work of rebuilding and resurfacing the axle to Temple, a welder, and to Yandle, a machinist, both of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Mims Crane Service, Inc. v. Insley Mfg. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API