Legal Opinion

Succession of Comberrel v. Comberrel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2013No. 2012-CA-1589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.

| ,The appellant is seeking reimbursement of succession funds that were disbursed outside of the succession proceedings. The trial court found that the funds were wrongfully disbursed and ordered a portion of the proceeds to be returned to the succession. For the reasons that follow, this Court finds that the trial court erred when it determined that the appel-lees were jointly and divisibly liable for less than one hundred percent of the proceeds. We find the appellees are liable in solido for one hundred percent of the unlawfully gained succession proceeds.

Irma…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Thomas v. North 40 Land Development, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. In Re Succession of BanksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re BarroisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. In re CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Succession of Charley A. Cheney, Sr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Succession of CheneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API