Legal Opinion

United States v. Danny Wade Arthur (90-6080), and Terry Keith Arthur (90-6079)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1991No. 90-6079, 90-6080PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendants Danny Wade Arthur (Danny) and Terry Keith Arthur (Terry), two broth*213ers, appeal from their convictions for the armed robbery of the Bank of East Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee (bank). Both defendants allege that numerous trial errors occurred that mandate reversal. Because Terry confessed to the crime from the witness stand, any error is harmless as to him. Danny’s conviction, however, is reversed because the district court induced a material witness to exercise his fifth amendment right to remain silent, and also because the district court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Juanita KendricksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Jeff D. NoelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Rockie Lane HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Santiago-BecerrilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Michael PriceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Caudill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API