Legal Opinion
Armco, Inc. v. Burns & McDonnell, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 23, 1992No. Case No. C-1-90-766Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Defendant’s counterclaim (doc. 20), the Defendant’s Response (doc. 28), and the Plaintiff’s Reply (doc. 33).
Although the facts of this commercial dispute are relatively complex, the legal issue before the Court presents a straightforward application of the parol evidence rule.
BACKGROUND
Before December 31,1985, Armco owned three engineering subsidiaries, one of which was Burns & McDonnell. In 1985,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.