Legal Opinion

Allen v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 21, 1986No. 58,192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

Plaintiff David N. Allen appeals from an order of summary judgment made pursuant to K.S.A. 60-256 that declared his sole remedy for personal injuries received to be that fixed under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, K.S.A. 44-501 et seq.

The subject of the appeal is the scope of both statutes cited above.

The issue that we will resolve here is whether under the uncontroverted facts a self-employed person can be brought within the Workmen’s Compensation Act as a “statutory” worker pursuant to K.S.A. 44-503.

The facts presented to the trial court by defendant in support of his motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hormann v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Kumberg v. KumbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denton v. Sunflower Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  2. Thompson v. Harold Thompson TruckingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  3. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  4. Aetna Life & Casualty v. Americas Truckway Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  5. Allen v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API