Legal Opinion
Kurihara v. CH2M Hill, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 21, 1998No. Civ.A. 98-570-APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion to Remand and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in an action that was filed originally in state court.
■ I.
On February 17, 1998, after lengthy settlement discussions with Steve Biskup, defendant’s corporate counsel, plaintiff filed this action in the Circuit Court for Fairfax County, alleging wrongful termination of employment in violation of Virginia common law. On February 18, 1998, Biskup, who does not have the authority to accept service of process on the defendant’s behalf, 1 received via federal express a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tech Hills II Associates, Cross-Appellee v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Reece v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., a Corporation v. Murphy Brothers, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Witzel v. 1969, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Brown v. Nikloads, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Pfeifer v. Dexcom, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023