Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Meyer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1965No. 3239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Our original opinion in this case affirmed a summary judgment which denied probate of an instrument offered as a holographic will and allowed the probate of an attested will and codicil. On petition for rehearing the proponent of the holographic will makes argument on six assignments of error.

Assignments numbered 1, 2 and 4 relate to matters fully argued in the original appeal. We consider these matters adequately discussed and disposed of in the original opinion and will not attempt to repeat or enlarge upon what has already been said.

Assignment of error numbered 3 challenges our statement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. SiltamakiWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lieuallen v. Northern Utilities CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Wilson's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Matter of Estate of LoomisWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API