Hansley v. Tilton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
65 S.E.2d 300 (1951)
234 N.C. 3
HANSLEY
v.
TILTON et al.
No. 749.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 7, 1951.
Deal & Hutchins, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff, appellee.
Hastings & Booe and Womble, Carlyle, Martin & Sandridge, all of Winston-Salem, for defendant, Jack Tilton, appellant.
ERVIN, Justice.
The assignments of error raise these questions:
1. Did the court err in refusing to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit after all the evidence on both sides was in?
2. Did the court err in excluding the testimony of James Malcolm, a witness for the defense, that the clearance lights on the school…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Miller v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. Chase Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.