Legal Opinion

Hansley v. Tilton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 749PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

65 S.E.2d 300 (1951)

234 N.C. 3

HANSLEY

v.

TILTON et al.

No. 749.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 1951.

Deal & Hutchins, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff, appellee.

Hastings & Booe and Womble, Carlyle, Martin & Sandridge, all of Winston-Salem, for defendant, Jack Tilton, appellant.

ERVIN, Justice.

The assignments of error raise these questions:

1. Did the court err in refusing to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit after all the evidence on both sides was in?

2. Did the court err in excluding the testimony of James Malcolm, a witness for the defense, that the clearance lights on the school…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Miller v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. State v. Chase Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API