Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Lee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ward county; Leighton, J. Action by James T. Morrison against Peter P. Lee. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the answer, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Ward county, sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to tbe answer of the defendant. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustáined by him as the result of an explosion of a mixture of kerosene- and gasolene which he purchased of the defendant as and for kerosene oil. Plaintiff relies for a recovery upon § 2223 of the Revised Codes of this state, which reads as follows: “Whoever shall knowingly use, sell, or cause to be sold unlawfully any of the illuminating oils specified in this article which are below 105 degrees…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Caspar v. LewinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Corwin v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Carterville Coal Co. v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Carlson v. GlanvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. LaPoint v. Hodgins Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API