Legal Opinion
Crifasi v. Governing Body of Bor. of Oakland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 20, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
151 N.J. Super. 98 (1977)
376 A.2d 576
JACQUES CRIFASI AND EDWARD VANDERBECK, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND AND JAMES MULCAHY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 20, 1977.
Mr. Malcolm Blum argued the cause for plaintiffs (Messrs. Carlton & Blum, attorneys).
Mr. Alfred J. Villoresi argued the cause for defendants (Messrs. Villoresi and Buzak, attorneys).
DALTON, J.S.C.
This order to show cause is a municipal election matter which projects issues respecting our Open Public Meetings Act, N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 et seq. (hereinafter Sunshine Law) and our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wene v. MeynerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Richardson v. CaputoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Stone v. WyckoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Jones v. East Windsor Reg. Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Evans-Aristocrat Industries, Inc. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crifasi v. Governing Body of Borough of OaklandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Clark v. DegnanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Boylan v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Allan-Deane Corp. v. Tp. of BedminsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Mulcahy v. Bergen County Board of ElectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.