Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Navins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1921No. 9938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on promissory note. Judgment for defendant. Error to the County Court of Rio Grande County, Hon. James W. White, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action by the payee against the maker of a promissory note. The defendant answered, in substance, that the note was given in renewal of a former note, and that such previous instrument was procured by the fraud of plaintiff’s agent, acting in conjunction with others. A .trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for defendant. The plaintiff brings the cause here for review.

Error is assigned to the trial court’s giving to the jury defendant’s requested instruction No. 1. That instruction reads as follows:

“You are further instructed that the fact that the defendant renewed the original…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ponder v. Altura Farms Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Vanderpool v. LoftnessColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Graham-Jones Motor Co. v. NutterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API