Legal Opinion
Driehorst v. Schnell
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 19, 2021No. 0:20-cv-01279Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Cody Driehorst, Civ. No. 20-1279 (PAM/KMM) Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Paul Schnell, Commissioner, Minnesota Dept. of Corrections In Individual capacity and Official capacity, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cody Driehorst is committed to the custody of the Minnesota Department of Corrections for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. (Def.’s Supp. Mem. (Docket No. 29) at 2.) He alleges that the Department of Corrections…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.