Legal Opinion

Comley, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Rowell v. Boyle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 5, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The relator is the owner of an undivided one-half interest and a lessee of the other half, in an unoccupied rectangular tract of land in the city of Stamford, forty by fifty feet in size. This tract is situated in a section which is established by the building code of that city as a “fire district” or as “fire limits,” and is also within a business zone as defined by the zoning regulations of the city.

Chapter X of the revised charter of the city creates a building commission of seven members, one being the building inspector of the city, three being the building committee of the common…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Welch v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Vartelas v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Bridgeport v. D'AulisaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Weaver v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API