Legal Opinion
Wall v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 2019No. S-17-0266; S-18-0127PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Chief Justice.
[¶1] Brent Wall was convicted of one count of first degree sexual assault of a minor. On appeal he claims that his right to be present at every stage of the trial was violated and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We find no reversible error and affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Mr. Wall presents two issues on appeal, which we restate as:
1. Did the district court commit reversible error when it responded to a juror note expressing confusion over DNA testimony without informing either party of the juror note and the court's response to it?
2. Was Mr. Wall's right to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Bittleston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Timothy Dean Leners v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.