Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Edwards

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 16, 1981No. 80-1101Published

1DissentJustice Stamos

I respectfully dissent. Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) sets out the basic provision governing when the State may appeal dispositions of the trial court:

“In criminal cases the State may appeal only from an order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in dismissing a charge for any of the grounds enumerated in section 114 — 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure * * (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)(1).)

Our supreme court, in People v. Love (1968), 39 Ill. 2d 436, 235 N.E.2d 819, made clear that the grounds for dismissal enumerated in section 114 — 1 are not all-inclusive and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API