Bosch Magneto Co. v. Rushmore
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill and answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, V. C.
This is a bill to specifically enforce.an agreement to give a bond with surety "for the faithful performance of a contract. The complainant purchased from the defendant his plant known *94as the Bushmore Dynamo Works at Plainfield, including patents and patent rights, for the manufacture of automobile dynamos, engine-starters, &c., for $750,000, payable in three installments of $250,000. Before the contract of sale was entered into, the Bijur Motor and Lighting Company, the patentee of a starter, notified the complainant, in writing, that the patents of the defendant on a starter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brower v. Glen Wild Lake Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Hayes v. Capitol Buick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Standard Surety, C., Co. v. Caravel IndustriesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- United Bonding Insurance Company v. SteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- De Caro v. De CaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.