Legal Opinion

Bosch Magneto Co. v. Rushmore

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 13, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

This is a bill to specifically enforce.an agreement to give a bond with surety "for the faithful performance of a contract. The complainant purchased from the defendant his plant known *94as the Bushmore Dynamo Works at Plainfield, including patents and patent rights, for the manufacture of automobile dynamos, engine-starters, &c., for $750,000, payable in three installments of $250,000. Before the contract of sale was entered into, the Bijur Motor and Lighting Company, the patentee of a starter, notified the complainant, in writing, that the patents of the defendant on a starter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brower v. Glen Wild Lake Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Hayes v. Capitol Buick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Standard Surety, C., Co. v. Caravel IndustriesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. United Bonding Insurance Company v. SteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. De Caro v. De CaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API