Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 16, 1943No. 30244, 30245PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
If decisions by this court hold to the contrary) including Bur dick v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 54 Ga. App. 868 (188 S. E. 923); Jones v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co., 45 Ga. App. 392 (165 S. E. 167); and U. S. Casualty Co. v. Henson, 43 Ga. App. 198 (158 S. E. 614), we are controlled by the principles announced, and the reasoning followed in the cases of Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co. v. Griggs, 190 Ga. 277 (9 S. E. 2d, 84), and Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Sprayberry, 195 Ga. 393 (24 S. E. 2d, 315). We do not think it can be questioned that physical exertion contributes to a heat…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Williams v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. SprayberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Jones v. American Mutual Liability Ins.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Burdick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Thomas v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- United States Casualty Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.