Barnes v. Towlson
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
O’HARA, Judge.
Defendant, Monumental Life Insurance Company (“Monumental”) has moved for summary judgment alleging that, as a matter of law, it is not vicariously liable for the alleged torts of defendant Carol B. Towlson (“Towlson”), or in the alternative, that she was not Monumental’s servant nor was she acting within the scope of her employment at the time the accident occurred.
This personal injury action arises out of an automobile accident involving the plaintiff Brenda Jo Barnes and Towlson. At the time the accident occurred Towlson was in the midst of a fourteen week training session as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Henkelmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Rappaport v. International Playtex Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SnyderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Clough v. Interline Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pettinaro Construction Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993