Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Woods, Housing Expediter. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1950No. 12955_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The Expediter, as plaintiff, prayed for an injunction restraining defendant from charging, or accepting, rent in excess of the maximum legal rent permitted and “that the Defendant be required and directed to restore to the tenants, or in the alternative to pay to the Treasury of the United States, all of the rent overcharges resulting from the collection of more than the maximum legal rent.”
fl] In Case No. 12948 the landlord appeals from a decree of the Court below requiring her to make restitution to certain named tenants in the total sum of $782.30. The chief ground of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Creedon v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Greenwood County v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Co-Efficient Foundation, Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Chambless v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. ValenzuelaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Severo Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
- Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957