Legal Opinion

State v. Humphries

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 2003No. 25629PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

Petitioners Claude and Phil Humphries were convicted of trafficking in marijuana. They were each sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment and fined $25,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. State v. Humphries, 346 S.C. 435, 551 S.E.2d 286 (Ct.App.2001). We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision and now reverse.

ISSUES

I. Did the Court of Appeals err by affirming the trial judge’s refusal to order the State to disclose the identity of the confidential informant?

II. Did the Court of Appeals err by holding improperly admitted “bad act evidence” was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. DiamondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. ShupperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. BurneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Hyman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. DillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. PradubsriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API