Legal Opinion

Darst v. County Election Board of Craig County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1944No. 31925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

F- A. Darst, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus to compel the county election board of Craig county to place his name on the ballot for the November, 1944, general election as the Republican nominee for county attorney of Craig county.

On April 28, 1944, Darst filed with the county election board of Craig county his declaration as a Republican candidate for county attorney. In his declaration he stated he was registered as a Democrat but voted Republican. No other person filed a.s a Republican candidate for county attorney. Frank L. Haymes filed as a Democratic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrow v. WipfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Swindall v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Bell v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Dove v. OglesbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Hart v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Wickersham v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Stevenson v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Murphy v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Adair v. CableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API