Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. McQuaid v. Pickens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 1932No. 13,035PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiee in error is hereinafter referred to as Mc-Quaid, defendant in error as Pickens, and the City and County of Denver as Denver.

Pickens was acting as municipal judge of Denver and McQuaid, claiming there was neither such office nor such officer, brought quo warranto to oust him. Judgment was for Pickens and McQuaid brings error.

Pickens claims under an ordinance. There is no present charter provision creating the office. If there were, that it would be valid is undisputed.

Amendment XX of our State Constitution, adopted in 1902, created the present municipality of Denver, made it a “Home…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  2. Newton v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Fishel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Hawkins v. HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. Laverty v. StraubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Laverty v. StraubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API