Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1951No. 4138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an action to condemn certain devices, instituted under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040, as amended by the Act of June 24, 1948, 62 Stat. 582, 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 301-392. 1

The devices are called “Color-Therm.” Each consists of a cabinet, a series of tubes mounted thereon which produce colored lights similar to neon lights, an applicator attachable to the cabinet by an extension cord and consisting of a handle and two tubes similar to those described above, and electrical accessories and connections for the operation of the device.

The action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Two Bags, Each Containing 110 Pounds, Poppy SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. 52 Drums Maple SyrupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. VARIOUS QUANTITIES OF ARTICLES OF DRUG LABELEDDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. 47 Bottles, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. 47 Bottles, More or Less, Jenasol RJ Formula '60'Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. 4 CansDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  4. United States v. Allbrook Freezing & Cold Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API