Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph MacChia Sr. Lawrence MacChia George MacChia Joseph L. MacChia Viktor Batuner Michael Varzar, John Barberio, and Marat Balagula

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 31, 1994No. Docket 94-1161, 94-1192PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants John Barberio and Marat Balagula (collectively, the “defendants”), having previously been convicted for their roles in a five-month scheme to defraud the United States of federal gasoline excise taxes, now interpose the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to bar the present prosecution for their roles in a broad-gauge tax evasion conspiracy employing similar techniques on a greater scale, over a period of years that wholly subsumes the period of the first conspiracy.

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. RahmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API