In the Interest of C.N.G.

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

M.G.S. appeals the circuit court’s judgment terminating her right to parent her son, C.N.G.1 She contends that clear, cogent and convincing evidence did not sup*566port the circuit court’s termination of her parental rights pursuant to § 211.447.4(3), RSMo 2000.2 Because the circuit court did not make the required findings under § 211.447.4(3), we reverse the circuit court’s judgment and remand with directions that the circuit court enter its judgment in accordance with § 211.447.

In its judgment terminating M.G.S.’s parental rights, the circuit court said:

The…