Legal Opinion
State v. Landry
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 18, 2001No. 99-551PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Kevin Landry, who has appealed his conviction in Superior Court (Murphy, J.) for felony theft by deception, RSA 637:4 (1996), moves to have his case removed from the 3 JX docket on the ground that its placement thereon violates his right to due process guaranteed by the New Hampshire Constitution. We hold that the procedures employed in the 3JX docket do not violate due process and therefore deny the defendant’s motion.
On August 19, 1999, the defendant was convicted by jury of felony theft by deception. The defendant appealed to this court, arguing insufficiency of the evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LeBaronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. McLellanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. Ke Tong ChenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002