Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1949No. 47319Published

1DissentOliver, J.

(dissenting) — Dtefendant Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company had more than three hundred agents in thirty-one states. The subagents’ contract made by defendants with plaintiff, Lewis, November 1, 1943, was a complete contract of considerable length upon the printed form of the Minnesota Mutual. It is entitled “Agents Contract.” It provides, in part: The general agent (Carnahan), pursuant to his contract with the company “-hereby appoints”' Lewis “as Agent to procure applications for policies on the lives of persons satisfactory to the Company” and to collect -and remit first-year…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Arentz v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Rape v. Mobile & O. R. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API