In Re Detention of Williams
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This is another in a series of appeals concerning the Sexually Violent Predator Act, Iowa Code chapter 229A (1999) 1 . See In re Detention of Garren, 620 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2000); In re Detention of Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544 (Iowa 2000). The case before us is distinguished by the fact that the respondent, Harold Williams, demanded and received a jury trial. See Iowa Code § 229A.7(2) (Supp. 1999). The jury’s unanimous verdict found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Williams is a sexually violent predator. That means he must be committed to the custody of the director of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. PlasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Varnum v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Phuoc Nguyen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.