Legal Opinion

In Re Detention of Williams

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 31, 2001No. 99-2055PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This is another in a series of appeals concerning the Sexually Violent Predator Act, Iowa Code chapter 229A (1999) 1 . See In re Detention of Garren, 620 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2000); In re Detention of Morrow, 616 N.W.2d 544 (Iowa 2000). The case before us is distinguished by the fact that the respondent, Harold Williams, demanded and received a jury trial. See Iowa Code § 229A.7(2) (Supp. 1999). The jury’s unanimous verdict found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Williams is a sexually violent predator. That means he must be committed to the custody of the director of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. PlasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Varnum v. BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Phuoc Nguyen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API