Legal Opinion

Hindry v. McPhee

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1898No. 1397PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.

*399We find nothing very perplexing in this ease. The appellees sued the appellant to recover a balance of $1,887.78, alleged to be dne on sales of merchandise. The merchandise was cement. The answer admitted the sales, but denied that the goods were of any value; and, by way of counterclaim, averred that the cement was purchased to be used in the construction of certain sewers under a contract between the defendant and the city of Denver; that the plaintiffs agreed to furnish to the defendant all the cement required for the work at $1.10 per barrel, the amount necessary being not less than 7,000…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moynahan v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Burnham v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Cheesman v. NichollColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Burnham v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Cheesman v. NichollColorado Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API