Legal Opinion

United States v. Ackerman

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 30, 2017No. Case No. 13–10176–01–EFMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is again before the Court on Defendant Walter Ackerman's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 19). Defendant seeks the suppression of an email and its attachments arguing that they were obtained through an illegal search and seizure. This Court originally denied Defendant's Motion to Suppress finding that AOL and the National Center for Missing and Exploited *1269Children ("NCMEC"), the parties who searched Defendant's emails, were not state actors. Thus, the Fourth Amendment was inapplicable to their conduct in this case. In the alternative, this Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. IrvingDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  2. United States v. AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. VanDyck v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API