Legal Opinion
Daniel Flores v. William Barr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 18, 2019No. 15-73461PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FLORES, AKA No. 15-73461 Richard Daniel Flores, Petitioner, Agency No. A013-068-941 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 13, 2019* Pasadena, California Filed July 18, 2019 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Jay S. Bybee, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 FLORES V. BARR SUMMARY**…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Victor Angeles Zamorano v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Israel Sanchez Rosales v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- F-R-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Kwang Park v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.