Legal Opinion

Renold Power Transmission Corp. v. Cunningham Bearing Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1985No. Civ. 84-1698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CONABOY, District Judge.

We consider here Defendant’s motion to dismiss this case for lack of in personam jurisdiction over it 1 or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the Southern District of Texas. 2 This motion has been briefed and opposed in timely fashion and is now ripe for determination. We shall first decide the jurisdictional issue.

I

Whether this Defendant has the requisite “minimum contacts” 3 with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to justify this Court’s assertion of jurisdiction here must be determined with reference to Pennsylvania’s “long arm” statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Derman v. Wilair Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Allied Leather Corp. v. Altama Delta Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Mickleburgh MacHinery Co. v. Pacific Economic Development Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Derman v. Wilair Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Osterhaus Pharmacy Incorporated v. CVS Health CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API