Legal Opinion

Moore v. Kempthorne

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 11, 2006No. Civil 2:06cv659PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MORGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Danielle Moore, Kristie Phelps, In Defense of Animals, the American Environment Foundation, and the Animal Welfare Institute (“Plaintiffs”), seek a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to prevent Defendants, the Department of the Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Defendants”), from conducting a limited black bear hunt in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge (“GDSNWR”) on December 1 and 2, 2006. Docs. 1, 3. This Court heard argument on this matter on the afternoon of November 30, 2006, and ruled from the bench.

In light…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  2. Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hughes Network Systems, Incorporated v. Interdigital Communications Corporation, Formerly Known as International Mobile MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Manning v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Field v. McMasterDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
  2. Sarsour v. TrumpDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
  3. Z-MAN FISHING PRODUCTS, INC. v. RenoskyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
  4. Cricket Store 17, LLC v. City of ColumbiaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  5. Ariel Ferrufino Mamani v. Jeffrey Crawford, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API