Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge. Action by the Buckeye Powder Company against the F. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Company and others. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.
In this action at law, which is brought under section 7 of the Anti-Trust Act of 1890, the Buckeye Powder Company, an Ohio corporation, is the plaintiff, and three New Jersey corporations are defendants. — the E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Company, the Eastern Dynamite Company, and the International Smokeless Powder & Chemical Company. In essence the declaration charged that the plaintiff’s business (the manufacture of black blasting powder) had been greatly injured and finally destroyed by the defendants’ unlawful conduct, in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Thiede v. Utah TerritorySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beaver v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- FL Mendez & Co. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Orenberg v. TheckerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- H. J. Jaeger Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.