Legal Opinion
Cropp v. Williams
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 2004No. 03-CV-823PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss
2Per curiam
Last year, the District of Columbia Council passed the Inspector General Qualifications Amendment Act of 2003 (“the Act”). See D.C. Act 15-94; 50 D.C. Reg. 4651 (2003). The Act changed the qualifications for the office of Inspector General of the District of Columbia, and contained a section which stated that if the incumbent — who is Charles C. Maddox— did not meet the new qualifications as of June 1, 2003, he could not “continue to hold the position and the position shall be vacant.” See D.C. Act 15-94, § 2(d); 50 D.C. Reg. at 4652. Mayor Anthony Williams…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Black v. DukesIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- District of Columbia v. Group Insurance AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Thorn v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- District of Columbia v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Grant v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Beraki v. ZerabrukeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Local 36 International Ass'n of Firefighters v. RubinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.