Newhouse v. Laidig, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Robert Newhouse, by his guardian ad litem, appeals a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company for personal injuries he received when he became entangled in a silo unloader. The issue is whether an exclusionary clause contained in a homeowner’s policy precludes coverage for the accident. We conclude that the exclusionary clause is inapplicable and reverse.
In considering motions for summary judgment, we must first examine the pleadings and affidavits to determine whether any factual dispute exists or if conflicting inferences might be drawn…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Tomlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Kennedy v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. BranchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Tacker v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Callahan v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Marshall v. FairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.