Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Dizik

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 17, 1940No. 8285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOINET, District Judge.

This court having considered the evidence introduced by the parties upon the issues presented, having examined the briefs of respective counsel upon the questions of law involved, was persuaded that the plaintiff had failed to establish its claims made in its bill of complaint herein and that plaintiff’s proofs did not warrant the court in entering a decree of cancellation or rescission of the disability and double indemnity provisions of the policy in suit. The court therefore determined that plaintiff had not sustained the allegations in its bill of complaint and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DeemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. KushmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Assurance Co. v. ShafferDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API