Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 20, 1909No. 43 (1,683)Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, District Judge.

This case comes before us upon an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, affirming the decision of the Board of General Appraisers on the classification of merchandise invoiced as “ramie sliver,” classified for duly by the Board of General Appraisers under paragraph 302, Schedule 1, § 1, and section 7, of the tariff act of 1897 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, 30 Stat. 175, 205 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1655, 1693]), by similitude to cotton sliver, against the protest of the importers. The merchandise was originally assessed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hahn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  2. Alexander Murphy & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  3. Hill v. Francklyn & FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API