Legal Opinion

Alexander Murphy & Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 14, 1908No. 35 (1,951)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the proper classification of importations of granite. In pursuance of designs and specifications for monuments, these pieces of granite, consisting of die, base, and cap, were dressed, ornamented, and polished abroad to size, scale, and design, and were imported in that shape. After importation, the monuments are set up; the several pieces being cemented or leaded together. The collector classed the imports under paragraph 118 of the tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 159 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1636]), while the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baldwin v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Vandegrift v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  5. Wanamaker v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API