Smith Oyster Co. v. Darbee & Immel Oyster & Land Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
In Equity. .Ón motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction,
1Opinion of the CourtWolverton, District Judge
(orally). This is a motion to dismiss ..the ¡action here pending, upon the ground that it does not really and {substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction of this court to try and determine. Several reasons are assigned in support of the motion, not all of which were insisted upon, , and I shall notice those, only that were urged at the argument as vital tp the cause. ■ .
{.'.' The action, or perhaps, more properly speaking, the suit, is designed {’as. one to quiet title. Whether it is sufficient for that purpose is dependent Upon .the subject-matter of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greeley v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.