Legal Opinion
United States v. Kelley
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 11, 1965No. Cr. A. No. 17480PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Under Rule 46(f) (4), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the surety herein has moved for full or partial remission of the previously-forfeited $15,000.00 bail bond in this case. The surety alleges that the defendant is now in Federal custody; that surety spared no effort or expense to locate him; that retention by the government of the full $15,000.00 constitutes unjust enrichment under the circumstances ; that the court has discretion to remit in whole or in part; and that surety is willing to have all the government’s costs and expenses deducted from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Smaldone v. United States. Varone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. D'ArgentoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- United States v. Public Service Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. William Greene Jackson, William C. Jackson, Surety-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Summit Fidelity & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Fook Dan ChinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Pueblo v. Rivera SegarraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995