Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Craven

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1930No. File No. 6950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

To pay a debt which he owed plaintiff, W. E. Gibson gave to plaintiff a check which proved to be worthless. Plaintiff had Gibson arrested pursuant to the provisions of chapter 121, Laws 1923, for giving the worthless check. Thereafter Gibson who was in jail, sent word to plaintiff that he desired to see him, and in the interview Gibson asked plaintiff if he would drop the charge if he settled the check. Plaintiff said “Yes,” and thereupon Gibson said he expected some money, but it had not come, and, taking out his watch, asked plaintiff if he would take the watch in settlement of the check.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. School District No. 61 v. AldersonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  3. Eads v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Murphy v. EraasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kennedy & Co. v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Law Capital, Inc. v. KetteringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Grand Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1933
  3. Latta v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API