Legal Opinion

Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. East Cambridge Savings Bank

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 13, 1994No. Nos. 92-P-39 & 92-P-419PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

Nearly eight months after the plaintiff, Arthur D. Little, Inc. (A.D.L.), brought an action in contract commenced by trustee process, Mass.R.Civ.P. 4.2, 365 Mass. 740 (1974), the trustee, East Cambridge Savings Bank (bank), attempted to amend its answer to indicate that the funds it held subject to the trustee attachment were encumbered by notes payable to the bank. The bank had initially filed an answer admitting it was holding substantial funds on behalf of the defendant in the contract action, Ad-nan International Marketing Inc. (Adnan), but not indicating that the funds were encumbered.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Lantner v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Schubach v. Household Finance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Morrison v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Gath v. M/A-Com, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Cady v. MarcellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Chervin v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API