Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 15, 2004PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We granted further appellate review in this case to consider whether an independent right of action exists under G. L. c. 93A, § 9, for unfair or deceptive claims settlement practices by a self-insuring corporate entity engaged in a trade or business. A judge in the Superior Court granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint alleging that the defendant corporation (a noninsurer) violated G. L. c. 93A, § 9, and G. L. c. 176D, § 3 (9), by engaging in “bad faith settle*452ment practices.” The Appeals Court concluded that the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint was an error of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Clegg v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Dodd v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Incase Incorporated v. Timex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. EielsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. Bingham v. Supervalu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Rafferty v. Merck & Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API