Legal Opinion

Lattimore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 2006No. A06A2047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found Isaac Lattimore guilty of armed robbery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. At the second phase of the bifurcated proceeding, the court found him guilty of possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer. He appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdicts, that the court erred in charging the jury, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the bench trial. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Foskey v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Spear v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Holsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Dorris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API