Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Wilmington
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 30, 1971PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHORT, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiff seeks a júdgment declaring that he is entitled to receive a disability pension from the City of Wilmington (City). This is the decision on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
The uncontroverted facts which have thus far been established are these: Plaintiff, on or about March 3, 1967, had been a member of the Wilmington police force for approximately 10 years. On that date, plaintiff was injured in the course of his police duties while riding a motorcycle belonging to the City, causing permanent, partial disability of his back and right leg. From March 4,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Holt v. Board of Police & Fire Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. FunkhouserWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension Fund v. StarasinichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- State ex rel. Weber v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hahn v. Police Pension Fund of City of WoodstockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- City of Wilmington v. MillerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Commonwealth v. KuterbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Flanigan v. West Virginia Public Employees' Retirement SystemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. State Board of Pension Trustees v. DineenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.