Michalski v. Decker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant, inter alia, to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement over a portion of the property of the defendants Joseph Decker, Regina *470Decker, and Robert Richner, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), entered September 2, 2003, as denied his motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fischer v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Weil v. Atlantic Beach Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Palma v. MastroianniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klumpp v. FreundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Shute v. McLuskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- H.S. Farrell, Inc. v. Formica Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Brennan v. SalkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Brennan v. SalkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.