Brennan v. Salkow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*782Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the record does not show that the subject property benefits from an easement implied by grant. “[W]hen property is described in a conveyance with reference to a subdivision map showing streets abutting the lot conveyed, easements in the private streets appurtenant to the lot generally pass with the grant” (Bogan v Town of Mt. Pleasant, 278 AD2d 264, 264-265 [2000]; see H.S. Farrell, Inc. v Formica Constr. Co., Inc., 41 AD3d 652, 654 [2007]; Nassau Point Prop. Owners Assn., Inc. v Tirado, 29 AD3d 754, 757 [2006]). In addition, in general, a “deed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beretz v. DiehlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Heim v. ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Palma v. MastroianniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Abacus Real Estate Finance Co. v. P.A.R. Construction & Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Michalski v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bekkering v. ChristianaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020